Heathcliff Monster or Victim - 2066 Words

Is Heathcliff a monster, or just misunderstood? Heathcliff. He is character that perplexes many with his enigmatic ways. With many film adaptations he is played in near enough the same as how he is in Bronte’s book – as a monster. But what is a monster? Is it that he is a vicious murderer? Is it someone with no sympathy for others? Or is it someone without a care in the world? Arguably Heathcliff is all of these and more.. Throughout Wuthering Heights, it can be seen that Heathcliff is a social outcast, not fitting in with anything the other inhabitants of Wuthering Heights do. Any reader of the book produces a completely different view of Heathcliff showing even more so that he is misunderstood by many people. There are different†¦show more content†¦This later Heathcliff is characterized by a coldness, by an incapacity to love and ultimately by consuming passion for revenge against those who have abused him. Just as he begins life, he ends life as an unloved, lonely outsider. In the first part of Nelly’s narration, she begins by telling how Heathcliff comes about the house. ‘We crowed round, and, over Miss Cathy’s head, I had a peep at a dirty, ragged, black-haired child.’ Such language explores that he is no ordinary child. The other children - Hindley and Cathy, couldn’t believe what their father had bought home. ‘Mrs Earnshaw was ready to chuck it out of the doors†¦asking how he could fashion to bring that gipsy brat into the house.’ Such a phrase would imply that if they were seen with the ‘gipsy’ they would be looked down on. They don’t understand Mr Earnshaw’s reason to bring him home. Cathy and Hindley rejected Heathcliff ‘they entirely refused to have it in bed with them, or even in their room..I put it on the landing of the stairs, hoping it might be gone on the morrow’ Nobody wanted it to be part of the household. This first introduction to Heathcliff alr eady explores the view he is socially beneath the other inhabitants of Wuthering Heights. He is typically described as outside of the family structure. This would make him self conscious about himself and could be a reason for his actions later on in his life. Heathcliff’s presence inShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of Mary Shelley s Frankenstein 1421 Words   |  6 Pagesstorms can create a sense of anger or confusion, whereas sunlight may generate a sense of happiness. Both novels are set in a cold, dreary time, adding to the theme of isolation throughout each. In Frankenstein, the reader is first introduced to the monster on a stormy night. â€Å"It was on a dreary night of November that I beheld the accomplishment of my toils. With an anxiety that almost amounted to agony, I collected the instruments of life around me that I might infuse a spark of being into the lifelessRead MoreJohn Milton s Paradise Lost2313 Words   |  10 PagesShelley. Wuthering Heights written by Brontà « presents Heathcliff as a modernization of Satan. The characters share the experience of evolving from their lives as outcasts within their societies by means of revenge. The monster in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein romanticizes the Miltonic concept of revenge found in Paradise Lost. Although the creation and experiences of Satan and the monster differ, their premises for revenge become similar as the monster realizes his contempt toward his position withinRead MoreAnalysis Of Emily Bronte s Wuthering Heights 1562 Words   |  7 PagesEmily Bronte†™s Wuthering Heights presents, Heathcliff, one of literature’s most mysterious characters to be found in fiction. From his first appearance in the book, he comes off as a shadow of a man, brooding and dark; an angry misanthrope at best and an abusive tyrant at worst. There are moments in which the reader empathizes with Heathcliff and other times where he becomes quite irredeemable. Perhaps he is a victim of circumstance, or just a scheming interloper. Maybe a both or neither? In theRead MoreGothic Literature and Romantic Literature2607 Words   |  11 Pagesornate and interesting to look at. They are beautiful on the outside and were harmless in history. However, as his depression escalates and his sins deepen, his collection becomes a â€Å"mix of tyrants and Renaissance revenge figures that poison their victims†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Platizky). His collection has become a reflection of himself; it is full of violence and sin and is rife with the actions that the tyrants and re venge figures committed. Gray’s mental deterioration is augmented by his obsession with his portraitRead MoreThe Story Of My Life5035 Words   |  21 Pagesswear, youre so weird. As he said this, however, a twinkle reappeared in his eyes and his crooked grin returned full force; as did the little monsters in my stomach, attacking the lining of my internal makeup. Im getting you a tea, too. You have to like tea to be mortal. The fact that he anticipated my love of tea is so NOT helping the tummy monsters situation!!! Welcome to Bojangles! May I take your order?! This was uttered by a staticky, cheerful voice from inside the building, one that

The Reliability Of Compensatory Health Beliefs And The...

The reliability of compensatory health beliefs and the effect it has on alcohol consumption Abstract Aim The aim of the study was to investigate whether reading government guidelines on alcohol consumption would affect an individual’s intentions to drink within the guidelines or not. The study is also focused on investigating the reliability of alcohol specific compensatory health belief scale using test-retest and internal consistency measures. Introduction There has been a lot of recent research into compensatory health beliefs, in particular what activates these beliefs. Compensatory health beliefs are beliefs that a person activates as compensation after engaging in unhealthy behaviours. An example of this is someone believing that they can have a piece of cake as they are going to the gym later. They understand that the cake is unhealthy but try and compensate for that by doing something healthy to counteract it. This study focuses on compensatory health beliefs surrounding binge drinking in the UK. Binge drinking has become a serious problem in the UK, in 2012-13, there were an estimated 1,008,850 admissions related to alcohol consumption where an alcohol-related disease, injury or condition was the primary reason for hospital admission or a secondary diagnosis. (2014, May 29). Statistics on Alcohol - England, Retrieved from http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB14184. This shows the severity of the alcohol problem in the UK and th at people abuse alcohol. TheseShow MoreRelatedFundamentals of Hrm263904 Words   |  1056 PagesDesign and Teams 127 Summary 127 Demonstrating Comprehension: Questions for Review 128 Key Terms 129 130 HRM Workshop Linking Concepts to Practice: Discussion Questions 107 Developing Diagnostic and Analytical Skills 107 Case Application 4-A: Casino Has No Sense of Humor Regarding â€Å"Dilbert† Comic 107 Case Application 4-B: Off-the-Job Behaviors 107 Working with a Team: Dealing in Gray Areas 108 Learning an HRM Skill: Guidelines for Counseling Employees 108 Enhancing Your Communication Skills 109

Character Analysis of Kino from Steinbecks Novel, The Pearl Essay Example For Students

Character Analysis of Kino from Steinbecks Novel, The Pearl Essay Topic: A. The main character (Kino) in this story is engaged in several struggles and challenges. Which of these struggles and challenges do you think is the most important? Elaborate with examples frm the story. The Pearl, which was written by John Steinbeck, took place in La Paz, Mexico. John Steinbeck began the story by describing the way of living of a pearl driver whose name was Kino. The successful marriage of Kino and his wife, Juana provided them a son, Coyotito. In the beginning of the story, they all lived idyllically, blissful and peaceful even they are not rich. After that, their living was changed to the evil one since Coyotito has been stung by scorpion. Facing to that problem, Kino and Juana tried their best to treat him. First, they thought that problem would be solved; in contrast, both of them face more serious problem that made Kino was engaged in several struggles and challenges were important, but the most one was the point that Kino escaped and traveled to the north. To support that point of view, I have many reasons. First, Kino and his family members travelled with both of fair and guilty. At that point, there was no peace in their lives anymore because Kino killed a person who robbed his pearl. Also his properties, such as canoe was damaged and house was burned, so the one thing he had to do was escaping to a new place, North. Even, he and his family were away from their ld place, they were full of tearness. For example, they walk all nights and rest during the day in the purpose not to let someone find them. Also, they coved their footprints so that they could not be followed easily. If someone found Kino, he might be robbed a pearl or arrested for killing someone. Moreover, Kino did everything to protect his family’s life. Kino last of human gualities when he tried to follow the trackers Kino acted like animals in order to find way to attack the trackers back. For instance, Kino’s body stiffened and he drew down his head and peeked out from under a fallen branch. He also dug little pits with his sandaled toes so that he could leap without warning and his feet would not slip. In addition, Kino had to be violent as animal to protect himself and his family. For example, Kino was uneasy and nervous, he lifted the big knife and felt its edge to attack the trackers. Finally, Kino become a murderer a gain. In the beginning of the story, he was the peaceful man but after that he killed a person to save his life. Now on, Kino acted again by killing three men. This point, Kino was a very difficult condition. He had to protect himself, his life and also Coyotito. It was so hard for him because he was a person with no rifle and had only knife was attacked by three men with a rifle. As a result, three of them were killed by Kino. Unfortunately, he also lost his beloved son, Coyotito even he was so struggle. In conclusion, the ways Kino and his family escaped from La Paz, was the most important of his challenges and struggles. This challenges sounds like a failure but a strong believe that it was a success for him and Juana was Kino realized what he should do to make his life harmful life. At the end, Kino had a great decision to though the pearl back to the sea in order to stop the evil in his family’s life.

Symbolism in Orewlls Shooting an Elephant Essay Example

Symbolism in Orewlls Shooting an Elephant Essay Name Instructor English 15 October 2010 Death of an Elephant: Symbolism in Orwell As a former business major, whenever I read, whether fiction or non-fiction, I tend to focus too much on the surface meaning—the facts—and I often miss the subtle symbolism and deeper meaning of a piece of literature. As an English major, I am attempting to change, but I am often skeptical of symbolism, fearing that we may be reading too much into an author’s words. For me, an assignment to discuss the symbolism in a piece of writing presents a challenge. George Orwell, however, makes reading between the lines and uncovering symbolism in his essays fairly simple. He gives up importance evidence that his works do contain deeper meaning in â€Å"Why I Write† when he says, â€Å"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic Socialism† (Orwell 67). He has been relatively successful because through his use of symbolism he avoids the didactic preaching that most intelligent people dismiss as manipulation or propaganda. The elephant, the most memorable and moving image in his essay â€Å"Shooting an Elephant,† must have political significance. The elephant, with its many human characteristics, symbolizes the Burmese people in that it is dominated and oppressed, it rebels against that dominance and oppression, and it dies a slow, agonizing death. An elephant makes an appropriate symbol for people in general because elephants are similar to humans in a number of ways. We will write a custom essay sample on Symbolism in Orewlls Shooting an Elephant specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Symbolism in Orewlls Shooting an Elephant specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Symbolism in Orewlls Shooting an Elephant specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer In his book When Elephants Weep, Jeffrey Masson tells of elephants having deep humanlike emotions: â€Å"from a Kenyan ‘elephant orange’ comes a report of baby African elephants who have seen their families killed by poachers and witnessed the tusks being cut off the bodies. These young animals wake up screaming in the night† (45). The young elephants, it seems, are having nightmares just as young human children would have in similar circumstances; they appear to be agonizing over the loss of their loved ones. Masson also states that â€Å"Charles Darwin [. . ] was not able to observe animals shedding emotional and called weeping one of the ‘special expressions of man’ Darwin noted one exception: the Indian elephant† (106). Elephants are unique in their similarity to humans; they are highly intelligent, hard working, social animals, with a capacity to feel sorrow and pain. Orwell is aware of the sensitivity and intelligence of the elephant and tells us of his reluctance to shoot it with its â€Å"grandmotherly air† (38), saying, in fact, that â€Å"it would be murder to shoot him†(38). The elephant has so many human characteristics, in fact, that when Orwell kills the elephant it is almost as though he is killing a human. The elephant’s sheer size makes it capable of representing more than just a single human; it represents a people: the Burmese people. The elephant in Orwell’s essay is specifically like the Burmese people in that it is subjected to oppression and violence at the hands of a person, or group of people, supposedly more intelligent and civilized. A large, intelligent animal like an elephant could only be controlled by a smaller animal, like a human being, through mental domination and fear. The act of taming and domesticating such a large, wild, sensitive animal must involve, at some point, physical punishment. Many would argue that the act of taming an elephant is, per se, cruel just as one society dominating and oppressing another is, in itself, cruel. The elephant was kept in chains, forced to work, and looked upon as a â€Å"huge and costly piece of machinery† (37), not as a living, breathing, feeling animal. The elephant performed his duties, not out of respect for the mahout, but to avoid punishment. The Burmese people are also held captive, but the British used guns where the mahout used chains. Orwell describes the treatment the Burmese received at the hands of the British in animal-like terms: â€Å"The wretched prisoners huddled in the stinking cages [. . . ]the gray cowed faces of the long term convicts, the scarred buttocks of the men who had been flogged with bamboo†(35). They were cages, as animals are caged, and they were flogged with bamboo as an unruly animal would be flogged. They seem to be afforded little or no human dignity and were beaten into submission and controlled through fear, like animals. He even describes their faces as gray, not the color of a healthy human face, the color of an elephant’s face. Later he refers to the Burmese as â€Å"beasts† (35). Like the elephant, the Burmese obeyed their oppressors, not out of respect, but out of fear of punishment. For both the Burmese people and the elephant, however, anger proves stronger than fear, and a rebellion results. The Burmese people rebel, through words and taunts, against the British rule, and the elephant has an attack of â€Å"must,† breaks his chains, and rampages through the bazaar rebelling against its mahout. Just as there is some wild, freedom-loving, instinct in the elephant that cannot be subjugated, there is a sense of pride and love of freedom within the Burmese that refuses to die. The Buddhist priests were the embodiment of this pride; Orwell says regarding the priests, â€Å"There were several thousands of them in the town and none of them seemed to have anything to do except stand on street corners and jeer ant Europeans†(35). The priests were, in fact, voicing the opinions of most of the Burmese people. They had an obligation, as the religious representatives of the Burmese, to make the unhappiness of the people known to their oppressors. They missed no opportunity to voice their displeasure, and â€Å"in an aimless, petty kind of way anti-European feeling was very bitter† (35). They were, in fact, able to create a general feeling of malevolence and resistance towards the British, making their oppressors almost as unhappy as they were. Their constant jeers and insults were effective, more effective, in arousing Orwell’s anger, than the elephant’s rampage. Orwell did not want to kill the elephant for his rampage; he realized that the elephant was basically a docile creature, and one temporary act of insanity should not bring about a death sentence. However, he is not so sympathetic regarding the Buddhist priests; he tells us, â€Å"I thought the greatest joy in the world would be to drive a bayonet into a Buddhist priest’s guts†(36). Ironically, Orwell does not kill a Buddhist priest, but he does shoot, and kill the elephant. The elephant’s death symbolizes the death of the Burmese peoples’ freedom, and sense of national pride. Both depart with difficulty and pain at the hands of the British. The elephant, once shot, dies â€Å"very slowly and in great agony† (40). Orwell tells us, â€Å"I waited a long time for him to die†(40). He describes the elephant’s slow, agonizing death in great detail; it becomes the focal point of the essay. At one point Orwell says of the dying elephant, â€Å"One could have imagined him thousands of years old†(40). We can easily imagine that the Burmese society was thousands of years old, with ancient customs and traditions cherished by the people and unappreciated by outsiders, like the British. The British waited a long time for the customs and pride of the Burmese people to die once British dominion was in place. Their undying pride is seen in their refusal to submit quietly to British rule. Orwell, as a police officer, and representative of the British empire often felt their resistance; this is evident when he says, â€Å"insults hooted after me when I was at a safe distance† (35). Word Count 1277 The entire essay Death of an Elephant is available through the public domainn at http://georgeorwellnovels. com/essays/shooting-an-elephant/ as